04854

May 31, 2018

Why I'm Quitting the Glencairn Glass

It comes as no surprise that spirits and beverage industry has identified the ideal glass for tasting whatever product they're trying to sell. There are separate wine glasses for enjoying your pinots noir and pinots gris, a wide variety of glasses to complement a certain style of ale or lager, and specific glasses for "fully experiencing" tequilas, gins, and brandies.

Mostly, this is insider stuff, employed at competitions, industry events, and certain high-end bars and restaurants with expansive "programs." But there is one specialty glass that has made its way into the homes of consumers and fans since it came into production in 2001: the Glencairn whisky glass.    

This is a tulip shaped glass made by the Glencairn Crystal company as the vessel par excellence for sipping Scotch whisky. It's endorsed by the Scotch Whisky Association, and it is used by every major whisk(e)y company in Scotland and Ireland. These days, you'll find them everywhere, from tasting rooms all over Kentucky Bourbon country to chain stores such as Crate and Barrel and even Target. They're not expensive, and seem to be an easy add-to-your-collection item for whiskey and bourbon enthusiasts.  

The idea is this: the glass is around 175ml (6 oz.) and is designed to hold 50 ml of spirit (1.75oz), the identified ideal ratio of liquid to air. The glass is made for "nosing," wherein the aromatic molecules coming off the liquid are funneled into a tighter bouquet at the top, allowing the sipper to maximize the nose and further enhance the experience. 

I have owned two of these for nearly ten years now, employing them whenever I have a bottle that cost more than $30 and want to get the most of my investment. And, admittedly, they do make great props for photoshoots. 

But.

I don't like them, and I think I'm done.

Why? Because I don't simply don't enjoy out of them as much as a standard rocks glass or tumbler. After many evenings trying to enjoy something complicated and well-aged, I've decided these do not enhance my experience at all. In fact, for me, they end up detracting from the enjoyment of something special on which I've spent my hard-earned money. Here's my argument:

Objection #1: They're too small. The fluted cylinder shape designed to concentrate the aroma certainly makes it better for nosing. But it makes it worse for sipping. I do not have an abnormally large nose nor face, but I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to fit both my nostrils and enough of my mouth in the glass to get the liquid to my palette. This requires me to smell and taste the spirit separately, and while that might work for identifying its characteristics, it does not make it more fun to drink. 

Objection #2: They're too dainty. Whiskey need not be big and brutal. Some of my favorite drams are light, complex, and sophisticated. But whiskey is still whiskey, and whether it has some high-proof heat or is delicate spice and floral notes, sipping a neat pour is not the same as enjoying something like champagne. It's a warming, intense experience, and the fact that its a-little-tough-to-swallow is all part of the fun. Pouring a 16-year-old Islay into this light little glass held with two fingers feels like smoking a brisket for twelve hours, then taking it to a tea party to be sliced paper thin and served on finger sandwiches with the crusts cut off. With my hands, the shape and scale of the thing literally makes me stick my pinky in the air, because there's not enough room for it on the glass. Fine for tea. Not for single malt. 

Objection #3: Enjoying whiskey at home is not the same as assessing it in tasting context. I do not think the whisk(e)y industry is wrong. I have full confidence that the people who taste some of the most complex and exquisite spirits in the world know how to best experience and assess them. And the next time I do a distillery tour in Kentucky, I fully expect the tastings of different mashbills, small batch, single barrels, and the like to come in the Glencairn glasses with the brand name etched on the outside. And I'll love it.

But, once you have a bottle at home, you're not there to distinguish among several styles and varieties. You're there to unwind, enjoy a glass or two, and marvel at the craft of the people who made this for you, with wonder at how ingredients as simple as grain, water, and charred oak could taste this good. 

At home, the Glencairn glass is fussy, and, at least for me, unnecessary. Don't set the table Thanksgiving-style for a cheeseburger. Even if it's an $18 one.

 

Now that's a whiskey glass. 

From now on, I'll follow my intuition, and enjoy my whiskey in rocks glass. It will be heavy on the bottom, with a nice, wide diameter so I can wrap my whole hand around it. A proper sip of whiskey is a full-bodied experience, and so I will use more of my body to enjoy it. It will feel weighty in my hand, because whiskey itself is a weighty experience. 

I will not be getting rid of my Glencairn whisky glasses. They will stay on the shelf next to my martini coupes, and on occasion, I will probably pull them out. They will likely still show up in ManMade photos, if only for variety and help with visual storytelling. But, on any given Saturday night as I savor my investment bottles, I'll be enjoying my Scotch, bourbon, or Irish pot still from a solid 10-12 oz tumbler. Perhaps my aroma molecules will dissipate faster due to the wider surface area and more exposure to air. That's okay. I'll feel more connected to the thing I paid for. Because that's what I love about whiskey.

And our differences are what makes the world go round. 

Tagged:

Post Comments

Add Your Comment!

(2000 character limit)

William Jones on Dec 03, 2018:

Disagree. Perfect shape and too small? I’m not that lazy that I can’t simply top it off when I need to. I like the smaller glass because enjoying an expensive Scotch is a treat. When I need a stiff one after a long day, it’s a Bombay martini.


Chad Winters on Dec 02, 2018:

I really like the Canadian version as a compromise as well, more comfortable too hold and drink from with some venturi effect


Kerry McCarthy on Nov 02, 2018:

I Love these glasses.

Afraid I'll have to disagree with the author's assessment.


Jared on Jun 01, 2018:

Nice post Chris!
I partly agree, a friend bought them for me for our wedding and I thought I landed the jackpot of a better drinking experience. Way too dainty, easy to tip over. However, we found the Canadian Glencairn. Perfect sized more like a rocks glass but still have the special-ness for those bottle I've saved up for!
https://www.crateandbarrel.com/canada-glencairn-whiskey-glass/s330345?localedetail=US&a=1552&campaignid=657519289&adgroupid=34201459355&targetid=aud-356254942704:pla-182213559416&pla_sku=330345&pcat=HSW&ag=adult&scid=scplp330345&sc_intid=330345&gclid=CjwKCAjw3cPYBRB7EiwAsrc-uc_ewXTsCDJfdmMRUUoYXP_T7MnqyasiLtqk7OUfBGPm4n6cz28o4RoCQv4QAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds


KJ on Jun 01, 2018:

I agree wholeheartedly. I have two rocks glasses that I love for whiskey. Both have heavy bottoms and a good heft. One has a nice cut glass pattern of the side and the other is nice and clear. When I want to spend some time and admire the color, I go with the clear one. Both let me experience the “nose” and taste at the same time. And they can sit on nearly any surface without worrying that a small bump will send to toppling over.


Chris the whiskey fighter on Jun 01, 2018:

I have to agree. As a big whiskey head, I too fell out of love with that glass style. Known as said whiskey head, I received two as a gift. One eventually broke to the gentlelist of handling, the second now collects dust. I just couldn't put a finger on it at the time, but I just had an empty feeling using it. Now I use a regular rock glass.